Resolving GitHub Push Error: RPC Failed; Result=22, HTTP Code=413

Nov 27, 2025 · Programming · 9 views · 7.8

Keywords: GitHub push error | RPC failure | HTTP code 413

Abstract: This article provides an in-depth analysis of the RPC failure error (result=22, HTTP code=413) encountered during GitHub push operations. By exploring the differences between HTTP and SSH protocols in Git, it offers effective solutions from a protocol-switching perspective, supported by case studies. Additional configuration adjustments and best practices are discussed to help developers avoid similar issues.

In the Git version control system, developers may encounter the error error: RPC failed; result=22, HTTP code = 413 when pushing large repositories to remote hosts. This error is typically related to HTTP protocol limitations on request body size, leading to push failures.

Error Cause Analysis

HTTP code 413 indicates "Request Entity Too Large," triggered by server-side configuration limits. When using HTTPS for Git operations, web servers like Apache or Nginx impose restrictions on the maximum size of a single request. For instance, by default, Nginx's client_max_body_size might be set to 1MB, and Apache's LimitRequestBody has similar constraints. If the push changes exceed this threshold, the server rejects the request with a 413 error.

In the provided case, the user attempted to push approximately 120MB of changes. Even after setting the local buffer to 500MB via git config http.postBuffer 524288000, the error persisted. This confirms that the issue lies not in client configuration but in server-side restrictions.

Solution: Switch to SSH Protocol

A straightforward and effective solution is to switch to the SSH protocol for Git operations. SSH does not suffer from HTTP request size limits due to its different communication mechanism. Here are the steps to switch protocols:

  1. First, check the current remote repository URL configuration using the command: git remote -v. If the output shows an HTTPS URL (e.g., https://github.com/user/repo.git), it needs modification.
  2. Change the remote URL to the SSH format using: git remote set-url origin git@github.com:user/repo.git. Here, origin is the remote name, and user/repo.git should be replaced with the actual username and repository.
  3. Verify the change by running git remote -v again to ensure the URL is updated to SSH.
  4. Attempt the push with: git push origin main (or the relevant branch name). The SSH protocol handles large file transfers without triggering the 413 error.

In the case study, the user resolved the issue successfully using this method, restoring normal push operations. SSH not only avoids size limitations but also offers enhanced security, making it ideal for frequent large-file push scenarios.

Additional Solution: Adjust Server Configuration

If HTTP/HTTPS must be used, server configuration can be adjusted to increase the request body size limit. For example:

However, this approach requires server access and might impact other services, so switching to SSH is often more convenient.

In-Depth Understanding of Protocol Differences

Git supports multiple transport protocols, including HTTP/HTTPS and SSH. HTTP is based on a request-response model and is prone to server configuration limits, whereas SSH uses encrypted channels for direct data transfer, making it more suitable for large file operations. From the reference article case, pushing a large number of objects (e.g., 315,257 objects, 592.69 MiB) can cause timeouts or rejections with HTTP, while SSH handles it stably.

To optimize Git workflows, it is advisable to prefer SSH protocol where possible, especially in scenarios involving large repositories or frequent pushes. This not only prevents 413 errors but also enhances security and performance.

Best Practices and Preventive Measures

To avoid similar errors, developers can adopt the following measures:

In summary, by understanding the root cause and flexibly applying protocol switches, developers can efficiently resolve the 413 error in GitHub pushes, improving development productivity.

Copyright Notice: All rights in this article are reserved by the operators of DevGex. Reasonable sharing and citation are welcome; any reproduction, excerpting, or re-publication without prior permission is prohibited.