Keywords: C++ | array initialization | member initializer list | aggregate types | list initialization
Abstract: This article provides a comprehensive examination of array initialization within constructor member initializer lists in C++. By analyzing the differing specifications in C++03 and C++11 standards, it explains why direct array initialization fails to compile and presents multiple viable solutions, including struct wrapping, static constant initialization, and C++11's list initialization features. The discussion covers best practices and considerations for various scenarios, aiding developers in better understanding and applying array initialization techniques.
Background of Array Initialization Issues
In C++ programming, arrays as aggregate types have different initialization methods compared to other data types. Particularly in constructor member initializer lists, direct array initialization often encounters compilation errors. Consider the following code example:
class C
{
public:
C() : arr({1,2,3}) // compilation fails
{}
private:
int arr[3];
};
This code fails to compile because the C++03 standard does not permit direct brace initialization of arrays in member initializer lists.
Limitations and Solutions in C++03 Standard
According to the C++03 standard, member initializer lists use direct initialization syntax, while arrays as aggregate types can only be initialized using copy initialization syntax. This explains why the following syntax is also invalid:
int arr[3] = {1,3,4}; // valid, but only at definition point
Solution Using Struct Wrapping
An effective solution involves wrapping the array within a struct:
class C
{
public:
C() : arr( arrData ) {}
private:
struct Arr{ int elem[3]; };
Arr arr;
static Arr const arrData;
};
C::Arr const C::arrData = {{1, 2, 3}};
This approach leverages the initialization characteristics of structs to indirectly achieve array initialization. The boost::array library is implemented based on this concept.
Special Case of Character Arrays
In some compilers, initialization of character arrays might be permitted:
struct A {
char foo[6];
A():foo("hello") { } // permitted by some compilers
};
However, this behavior may vary across different compilers and is not a standard portable solution.
C++11 List Initialization Solution
C++11's introduced list initialization feature completely resolves this issue. The new syntax allows direct brace initialization of arrays in member initializer lists:
struct A {
int foo[3];
A():foo{1, 2, 3} { } // valid in C++11
};
It is important to note that direct brace syntax must be used, not braces within parentheses:
A():foo({1, 2, 3}) { } // still invalid
Dynamic Array Initialization
For arrays allocated on the heap, C++11 also provides corresponding initialization methods:
class Solution
{
private:
int* args = nullptr;
public:
Solution(int a, int b) : args(new int[2]{a,b}) {}
~Solution() { delete[] args; } // destructor must be provided
};
This method combines dynamic memory allocation with list initialization but requires special attention to memory management to avoid leaks.
Technical Summary
The core issue of array initialization lies in C++'s initialization rules:
- C++03 does not allow direct array initialization in member initializer lists
- Struct wrapping is the standard solution under C++03
- C++11 list initialization provides direct syntactic support
- Dynamic array initialization requires proper memory management
- Different compilers may have varying implementations for certain edge cases
In practical development, it is recommended to prioritize C++11's list initialization syntax. If C++03 support is necessary, the struct wrapping approach should be used. For dynamic arrays, ensure correct memory management to prevent resource leaks.