DevGex Search

This article provides an in-depth analysis of HTTP header name case sensitivity based on RFC 2616 and RFC 7230 standards. Through PHP code examples, it demonstrates practical header setting methods in development and discusses compatibility issues arising from applications violating RFC specifications. The paper also offers practical solutions for handling case-sensitive headers, helping developers better understand and apply HTTP protocol standards.

This article delves into the specification requirements for request bodies in HTTP PUT requests, analyzing the criteria for body existence based on RFC 2616 standards and explaining the critical roles of Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers. Through technical breakdowns and code examples, it clarifies how servers should handle PUT requests without bodies and offers best practice recommendations for client implementations, aiding developers in correctly understanding and managing this common yet often confusing HTTP scenario.

This paper explores the semantic differences between the slash (/) and its encoded form (%2F) in HTTP URL paths, based on RFC standards such as RFC 1738, 2396, and 2616. It analyzes the encoding behavior of reserved characters, noting that while non-reserved characters are equivalent in encoded and raw forms, the slash as a reserved character holds special hierarchical significance, and %2F should not be interpreted as a path separator in URL paths. By examining practical handling in frameworks like Apache and Ruby on Rails, the paper explains why applications should distinguish between / and %2F, and discusses encoding strategies and best practices for including slashes in route parameters.

This technical article provides an in-depth analysis of the HTTP Content-Length header, explaining its role in indicating the byte length of entity bodies in HTTP requests and responses. It covers RFC 2616 specifications, the distinction between byte and character counts, and practical implications across different HTTP versions and encoding methods like chunked transfer encoding. The discussion includes how Content-Length interacts with headers like Content-Type, especially in application/x-www-form-urlencoded scenarios, and its relevance in modern protocols such as HTTP/2. Code examples illustrate header usage in Python and JavaScript, while real-world cases highlight common pitfalls and best practices for developers.

This article provides an in-depth analysis of the HTTP 502 Bad Gateway status code applicability when proxy servers receive no response from upstream servers. Based on RFC specifications and technical practices, it examines the definition scope of "invalid response," including connection refusal, timeout, and server crash scenarios. Through practical cases and code examples, it details proxy-layer error handling mechanisms and offers best practices for network troubleshooting.

This article provides an in-depth exploration of the semantic correctness of HTTP GET requests returning 204 No Content status codes, analyzing their technical validity based on RFC 2616 standards. By comparing the differences between 404 Not Found and 200 OK empty responses, it clarifies the appropriate usage scenarios for different status codes. Combining practical cases from Google App Engine and Channel API, the discussion focuses on selection strategies between GET and POST methods, with particular attention to caching behavior and operational semantics. The article includes complete Java code examples demonstrating proper implementation of 204 responses in Servlets.

This article delves into methods for customizing User-Agent in Python 2.x using the urllib2 library, analyzing the workings of the Request object, comparing multiple implementation approaches, and providing practical code examples. Based on RFC 2616 standards, it explains the importance of the User-Agent header, helping developers bypass server restrictions and simulate browser behavior for web scraping.

This article delves into the core distinctions between HTTP 302 FOUND and 307 TEMPORARY REDIRECT status codes, focusing on redirection behavior for POST, PUT, and DELETE requests. By comparing RFC 2616 specifications with historical implementations, it explains the common issue in 302 redirects where user agents convert POST to GET, and how the 307 status code explicitly requires clients to preserve the original request method. The coverage extends to other redirection status codes like 301, 303, and 308, providing practical scenarios and code examples to help developers choose appropriate redirection strategies for reliable and consistent web applications.

This article provides an in-depth analysis of the HTTP methods HEAD and OPTIONS in RESTful API architectures. Based on RFC 2616 specifications, it details how OPTIONS queries communication options for resources and how HEAD retrieves metadata without transferring the entity body. By contrasting common misconceptions with actual standards, it emphasizes the importance of these methods in API design, offering PHP implementation examples to help developers build HTTP-compliant RESTful services.

This paper provides an in-depth exploration of the complete technical pathway for building an HTTP server from scratch using C language. Based on RFC 2616 standards and BSD socket interfaces, it thoroughly analyzes the implementation principles of core modules including TCP connection establishment, HTTP protocol parsing, and request processing. Through step-by-step implementation methods, it covers the entire process from basic socket programming to full HTTP 1.1 feature support, offering developers a comprehensive server construction guide.

This technical paper provides a comprehensive examination of the HTTP Content-Disposition response header, covering technical specifications, security considerations, and practical implementations. Based on authoritative standards including RFC 6266, it systematically analyzes the semantic differences between attachment and inline directives, detailing specific implementation methods in scenarios such as file downloads and multipart form submissions. Through ASP.NET code examples, it demonstrates server-side configuration techniques and offers practical guidance on key technical details including filename encoding and browser compatibility. The paper also examines potential security risks and protective measures from a security perspective, providing comprehensive technical reference for web developers.

This article provides an in-depth examination of whether entity bodies are allowed in HTTP DELETE requests. By analyzing HTTP specifications including RFC 2616, RFC 7231, and RFC 9110, it details the semantic definitions of entity bodies in DELETE requests, server processing behaviors, and compatibility issues in practical implementations. The article combines concrete code examples with protocol clause analysis to offer practical guidance for developers on DELETE request design.

This technical paper provides a comprehensive analysis of URL length limitations across different browsers. Starting from HTTP standard specifications, it examines recommendations in RFC 2616, RFC 7230, and RFC 9110, combined with actual limitation data from major browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, IE/Edge. The paper also discusses URL length restrictions imposed by search engines and CDN providers, while offering best practice recommendations for URL design to help developers optimize website performance while ensuring compatibility.

This article explores the differences and synergistic effects of the no-cache and no-store directives in HTTP cache control. By analyzing RFC specifications and historical browser behaviors, it explains why using no-cache alone is insufficient to fully prevent sensitive information leakage, and how combining it with no-store provides stricter security. The content details the distinct semantics of these directives in cache validation and storage restrictions, with practical application scenarios and technical recommendations.

This article explores the allowed character sets in cookie names and values, based on the original Netscape specification, RFC standards, and real-world browser behaviors. It analyzes the handling of special characters like hyphens, compatibility issues with non-ASCII characters, and compares standards such as RFC 2109, 2965, and 6265. Through code examples and detailed explanations, it provides practical guidance for developers to use cookies safely in cross-browser environments, emphasizing adherence to the RFC 6265 subset to avoid common pitfalls.

This article provides an in-depth analysis of cookie expiration mechanisms, exploring technical approaches to achieve 'never-expiring' cookies and their inherent limitations. Through practical code examples in PHP and JavaScript, it details methods for setting cookies with distant future dates while addressing key challenges such as the Year 2038 problem and browser restrictions. The paper includes RFC specification references and best practice recommendations to help developers properly understand and apply cookie expiration mechanisms.

This paper provides an in-depth examination of query string length limitations in HTTP, starting from the theoretical unlimited nature in RFC specifications to detailed analysis of practical constraints in major browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE, Opera) and servers (Apache, IIS, Perl HTTP::Daemon). By comparing limitations across different platforms, it offers practical configuration advice and best practices for web developers to avoid HTTP errors caused by excessively long query strings.

This article provides an in-depth analysis of the HTTP 304 Not Modified status code semantics and its handling in proxy server implementations. Through examination of actual code cases, it explains that the 304 status is not an error but a caching optimization mechanism, and offers technical solutions for proper handling in HttpWebRequest. Combining RFC specifications with practical experience, the article details the working mechanism of If-Modified-Since headers, request forwarding logic in proxy servers, and strategies to avoid misinterpreting 304 responses as exceptions.

This article provides an in-depth exploration of the selection between PATCH and PUT methods in REST API design, focusing on partial resource update scenarios. By comparing RFC specifications with practical application cases, it explains the advantages of the PATCH method for updating resource status and how to avoid non-RESTful design patterns that use verbs in URLs. The article also offers specific code implementation examples and best practice recommendations to help developers build more standardized and maintainable API interfaces.

This article provides an in-depth examination of the essential differences between GET and POST methods in the HTTP protocol, covering semantic definitions, data transmission mechanisms, security considerations, caching behavior, and length limitations. Through comparative analysis of RFC specifications and real-world application scenarios, combined with specific implementations in PHP, AJAX, and jQuery, it systematically explains the proper usage principles and best practices for both methods in web development. The article also addresses advanced topics including idempotence, browser behavior differences, and performance optimization, offering comprehensive technical guidance for developers.